The gun control issue has recently created a massive uproar throughout the U. S. Due to some major horrific events such as the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007, where 32 people were killed, the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012 where 27 people were killed, mostly children, and the Columbine shooting in 1999 where 13 people were killed, (CNN) as well as many others. To some, it is a crime Issue, to others It’s a right’s issue. It Is, obviously, a safety Issue, an education Issue, a racial Issue, and a political Issue, among others. ND within each of these Issues there are those who want more gun intro, the Democrats, and those who want less, the Republicans. There are lots of opinions on both sides of the issue ranging from moderate to extreme, and each has good points and arguments. Is there really a “right” party? The second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be Infringed. The Founding Fathers included this In our Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population If the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals. Holbrook 65-84) The Republican Party position on gun control doesn’t simply revolve around a fondness for firearms, but instead a fundamental principal to uphold the rights that our nation was built on. (Know the Republican Platform) They believe that every American has the right to own, carry, Frazier 2 and use a firearm.
Republicans feel the government regulation over firearms In unconstitutional and an infringement on an individual’s basic rights. The chief point made by Republicans in congruence with the second amendment – one should always be given the right to protect himself, his family, or his property. (Know the Republican Platform) Conservatives have long honored the 2nd Amendment and the traditions of shooting sports such as skeet shooting and animal hunting. In many places hunting Is one of the means of a reliable source for food.
The Republican Party under George W. Bush consistently fought for the creation of more hunting grounds, and widening access for shooting clinics. (Know the Republican Platform) The majority of Republicans feel that one of the shortcoming of the Brady Bill (discussed in the next paragraph) is that it only effects legal firearm transactions. It is widely known that criminals have many ways to obtain weapons without going wrought the process mandated by the Brady Bill.
According to studies, “only one firearm of every six used In a crime Is obtained legally” (Thomas 277) With that being said, Republicans question what good the bill has actually done. They also wonder how future restriction could actually reduce the crime level. To the Republicans it’s not the legality of the gun control issue, it’s the ineffectiveness of it. The Democrats have a totally different outlook on the gun control issue at hand. The rational given for most modern gun control legislation is “crime control”. The Brady Hinkle during an assassination attempt on President Reagan in 1981.
Supporters of the Brady Bill used that incident to gain support for their gun control legislation, claiming it would reduce crime and save lives. (“Guns” 51) In Tom Dais’s book he asks; “Why, when other articles of the Bill of Rights – such as those involving searches, wiretaps, and preventative arrests – are “balanced” Frazier 3 against the fear of terrorism, is the second Amendment fiercely claimed to be “untouchable” by the gun lobby and the politicians who hew to its line, and is slavishly protected by activist conservative Judges”? The Last gun Pig 3) In 2013 after he Newton, Connecticut mass shooting, President Obama made a proposal to ban assault rifles, high capacity gun magazines, and increase the rigor and efficiency of the background check system in an effort to “close loopholes [in the system]”(Adams 956) Democrats continue to push for stricter, harsher gun control measures to prevent the crime they believe guns are causing. The majority of Democrats believe in the right to bear arms, they Just want stricter measures for the buying and owning of weapons to individuals.
They are trying to strengthen gun control to reduce the violence ineffective gun control has caused. I believe there are many pros and cons for both parties arguments. In the wrong hands, one gun is Just as deadly as another, as well as knives, bats, and anything else that could be used as a weapon. It’s not the weapon that causes the problem, it is the physiology of the person behind the weapon. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. I do think there should be stricter monitoring of guns, registration, and who’s hands the guns truly are in.
The development of stricter rules and laws for the person who actually commits the crime could also help to deter crimes involving guns. People who commit lethal crimes involving guns should receive mandatory death sentences. Punishing law abiding citizens who have every right under the 2nd Amendment to own a gun is not fair in my opinion. Restrictions should not be placed on responsible firearm owners. Throughout history violence has plagued our human race. We have passed laws to protect society, but the violence continues.
Laws attempt to change human behavior, but have proven Frazier 4 To be ineffective in that aspect. Laws are not enough to protect people from aggression. We must allow people the means to protect themselves. Protection is a major reason that about half of all Americans own a firearm. Lester 30) It’s a constant battle and now is the time for the U. S. Government to have conversations about gun control and focus on what it needed to solve this problem of criminal gun use. It is not the time for the Democrats and the Republicans to keep the argument going.