Anti Gun Control

Not Stop Gun Violence in America For many decades gun control has been an ongoing controversy for those who believe guns should be outlawed and those who want the 2nd amendment to be honored. Although guns do have the potential to be dangerous, they are used for self defense, law enforcement, hunting, and to protect others from unwanted harm.

Guns put In the wrong hands could lead to catastrophic events, and In the past It has. Due to these horrific events guns have been put on a pedestal and been peculated as too dangerous for American citizens to handle, and the right to own a gun should be taken away. Many people who are for gun control believe “the more lax gun laws are… The more likely one is to face someone with a firearm who has no business owning one” (Holt), but criminals are not called criminals because they obeyed the law.

According tattoos Horton, a pro-gun advocate, societies against gun control believe otherwise and consider the gun ban has an unintended effect: it emboldens criminals because they know the law-abiding District residents are unarmed and powerless to defend them. Studies done by the Bureau of Justice Statistics report firearm homicides have declined 39 percent since 1993, and “a separate study by the Pew Research center put the decline at an even more Impressive 49 percent” (Barrett). In the same research. He government had reported that an average of about 22,000 nonfatal shootings occurred annually from 1993 to 2002 and from 2002 to 2011 that number had declined by about half. Even though there has been a drastic decline, people who are anta-gun supporters want to create stricter regulations making it tougher to own a gun or even take guns out of the society completely. Implementing gun control policies throughout the U. S. Will not make guns disappear. Furthermore It will Just mask all citizens good or bad have automatic weapons. Gun control laws were made up in effort to regulate and control the sales of guns.

In the history of gun control, American Rifleman published an article by Stephen P. Holbrook, PhD. , J. D. , where he explained Hitter’s use of firearms registration lists led to the confiscate of guns, and the execution of gun owners. He also observes “registration makes It easy for a tyrannical government to confiscate firearms and to make prey of its subjects” (Fee;re). Throughout the world guns controlled by the government has made it easy for those in power to do whatever they want to their people. Studies in the article Do Strict Gun laws really stop gun Crime? Y Myths Holt, the gun control movement tried for 30 years from the sass’s to the 1 sass’s to ban hand guns, but had failed miserably. Senate Rand Paul, pro-gun advocate and a republican In Kentucky, “has Implied he will filibuster new proposals and has said to Obama, “Call me if any of your reforms would’ve saved those kids at Sandy Hook” (Fetter). He does not believe any new laws to be passed on gun control would ND director of the National Rifle Association, Justifies the reason for gun control is due to the insane people who have had their chances to obtain guns, and using them in criminal behavior.

She also includes that the “Obama Administration has a pathetic enforcement record, including an abysmal failure to enforce existing legal prohibitions on purchases of firearms by persons adjudicated mentally incompetent” (Mitchell). An author for The Washington Times, David Gherkins, notes in his article Seen. Joe Manikin Ill thinks we need to strengthen our approach on mental illness, as well. Overall, people believe that mental illness should not be taken lightly when buying or obtaining an automatic weapon. Amongst gun control follows controversies, and not Just one or two, many.

Under the current law, gun dealers hold a Federal Firearms License and are required to conduct instant background checks before allowing a firearm to a buy, but “transfers between people who are regularly engaged in business of dealing firearms fall outside this requirement” (Irvin Jar. ). This includes family to family transfers or family to friend transfers, anyone dealing outside of a gun dealership. Though universal background checks are a great idea, it will not stop a criminal from obtaining and using it to break the law. The communities of pro-gun control believe it is a vital necessity to the welfare of our nation.

They feel many deaths caused by guns can be stopped by controlling the ownership of guns within the U. S. According to Paul M. Barrett, author of Good News on Gun Violence Could Shape Gun control Debate, the main argument gun control advocates have long made is that tighter restrictions on firearms are needed to cut crime. This has been proven wrong; the states with the highest amount of murder dates by guns had the some of the strictest gun control laws. In 2011 data from the Bi’s Uniform Crime Reports, California had the highest number of gun murders, as well as the strongest gun control laws.

Along with this report, Washington, D. C. Has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation, and yet again, the gun murder rate remains dramatically high, the highest in the United States. Through these studies, the states with strictly regulated gun control laws do not correlate with less guns equals less crime, in fact it has done the exact opposite. Keith Liebermann of MANIC as said, “Organizations like the NEAR are trying to increase deaths by gun in this country’ (Stolen). You cannot argue that “Guns in the right hands help public safety.

Guns in the wrong hands harm public safety’ (Holt). Societies with Pro-Gun Laws do not have a strong argument except the fact that clinically insane or any other mental illnesses should not be able to obtain a gun. Taking Sandy Hook Elementary into consideration, “Connecticut has among the most stringent gun control laws in the country-?There are ample laws on the books that restrict gun purchases by those who shouldn’t buy them” (Mitchell). Yet, Adam Lana was still able to gain access to the weapons. In the article, Why Gun Control is Bad for America? By James H.

Fetter, he explains the weapons allegedly used by Adam Lana were lawfully obtained by his mother in accordance with Connecticut laws. Which shows, no matter how many gun laws are passed out there, criminals or the mentally incompetent will find a way to retrieve a weapon. Because of our founding fathers, the United States Bill of Rights protects the right to bear arms. Some experts maintain that it was added because of the need for a support owner ship of a wide range of weapons, the “Supreme Court has supported a reader interpretation of the law as a fundamental right of American citizens” (Fetter).

It also states in the 2nd amendment that this right to bear arms will not be infringed; consequently banning guns would take one of our rights away. History has a way of repeating itself. Throughout several political administrations, one continual of tyrannical government has been disarming citizens. “No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the yarn in government” -Thomas Jefferson.

When disarming citizens, there will be too much power on government side leaving the common people defenseless, and unable to fend for themselves. Not saying the American government would ever believe on eliminating its own citizens for their benefits, but rather be safe than sorry. Which lead into “gun control is not about guns- it’s about control” (Mitchell). The idea that regulating the type of gun you can purchase, limiting the size of a magazine or background checks will stop murders like so many school shootings from happening is absurd.

Any criminal will find his or her way to get their hands on any type of weapons that comes thrown at their way. Gun requirements vary throughout the United States, although there are some basic federal laws which affect the U. S. Nationwide. The National Rifle Association have noted restrictions on guns such as a person must be 21 or older to purchase a weapon , no person convicted of a crime can own a gun, and persons who engage in the business of buying or selling firearms must be licensed.

The implementations of gun control laws have been boundless and widespread though they do not altogether block people room attaining a firearm. Although I am in the military, I do not always believe what the government has told me about guns to be true. Not from my chain of command stationed in Pensacola, but rather those I do not interact with everyday, such as people in Congress. Through writing this paper, I have asked many officers, petty officers, seamen, seamen apprentices, and recruits their view on gun control.

Without any questions asked to why I would be asking, they all agreed gun control should only be for those who are A- criminals or B- mentally unstable. The law-abiding citizen would not get punished because of a few bad apples that have taken guns and done evil things with them. How guns are used is completely up to the person in possession of it. Any type of weapon cannot physically hurt a person by themselves. It takes at least one person to decide how a weapon shall be used for good or bad.

Having my qualifications to use guns, I do believe those who have guns should have at least one safety class Just to reeducate the correct way to use one. I do not believe gun control laws will end violence considering a disturbed person does not need a UN to be destructive. It actually might have an adverse effect; removing guns from these types of people will not make them any less violent, it might Just make them even more violent. Even though I do not use guns to hunt game, I do enjoy going to the gun range for some target practice. Not only does it help me aim more efficiently, it gives me a sense of security.

If anything were to happen, instead of being completely uneducated about guns I know exactly how they work, and how to use a lot of practice. All in all, some type of screening to own a gun would not be a bad dead; it would definitely help provide some sort of boundary to those who are allowed to carry an automatic weapon. Believing guns are the reason there is more crime rather than there is Just violent people in the world Just seems a bit ridiculous. Not taking into consideration that human beings are the ones that control objects, such as guns, not the other way around.

If that were the case, why not ban all sorts of weapons; anything could be a weapon. From a paper clip to a car, all could be used as an object to harm others. In any case, completely ignoring the 2nd amendment and banning guns would create uproar with many pro-gun citizens. Though some gun control is a good thing, such as background checks and at least 21 of age to purchase a gun, there should not be any reason to put anymore laws into effect. As said before, criminals will get their hands on a weapon one way or another. If it’s not a gun, then it could be anything else.

No other gun control legislation can or could have prevented the catastrophes that happened in Connecticut or Colorado. Each of these events had a mentally incompetent person involved in the massacres, and we have laws for these types of people. Furthermore, more gun regulations will not stop violent crimes in America. It is how we use our resources to stop these people from creating even more violent occurrences, and that is letting citizens have the right to own their guns. Gun control is not going to save lives as many pro-gun control advocates believe.

The only thing that will actually save lives is educating those who know nothing of guns, and knowledge to be widespread through our nation. There are too many people who have never even held a gun, and even be in the same room as a gun to decide if they are for gun control or anti-gun control. The only way people will actually get an understanding of the information is to be informed, rather than going off other opinions. Gun Control: Stronger Gun Regulation Will Not Stop Gun-violence in America An Annotated Bibliography Fetter, James H.. “Why gun control is bad for America?. Press TV. Press TV, 3 Par. 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. In this article, Dry. James H. Fetter explains the reasons why gun control revolves around the 2nd amendment, and therefore does not support the need to do away with guns completely. It’s also a written right of an American Citizen to protect themselves. He analyzes the events of Sandy Hook noting the weapons used were lawfully obtained by the mother, and as a result the regulations that have been proposed in the Connecticut restrictive legislation would not have affected his access to the weapons used. Dry.

Fetter clarifies the importance of the 2nd amendment because we need to have the ability to resist the tyranny of enemies, not only foreign, but as well domestic. Mitchell, Cleat. “At the Center of the Gun Debate, a Bad Enforcement Record. ” NY Times Advertisement. The New York Times Co. , 18 Par. Washington lawyer and director of the National Rifle Association perceive the season why the legislation failed. She notes the new gun control law is actually not for guns, but instead the control. She brings up the Connecticut having among the most stringent gun control laws in country, and they did not save the children in Newton.

She also mentions the Senate bill failed because nothing in the legislation would have prevented another Sandy Hook, and to stop blaming the National Rifle Association and law- abiding gun owners for the acts of insane people. Jar. , David B. Irvin, and Andrew M. Grossman. “The rush to a bad gun-control law. ” Featured Articles From The Washington Post. The Washington Post, 15 Par. 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. This articles talks about those who support stricter gun control wanting to take a few weeks or months off the legislative process will result in bad law, and with unintended and lasting consequences.

It is understood in the current law that gun dealers hold a Federal Firearms License (FL) and required to conduct instant background checks before handing a firearm to a buyer. Even though there are background checks, the transfers between people are not engaged in the business of dealing firearms fall outside this requirement like transfers among family members ND friends. It talks about the Reid Bill which would close this type of loophole by all going through the FL. Gherkins, David. “Gun control: Good for law-abiding Americans, bad for the ‘insane,’ Manikin says. Washington Times – Politics, Breaking News, US and World News. The Washington Times, LLC, 20 June 2013. Web. July David Gherkins talks about Seen. Joe Manikin Ill and how his efforts to pass gun- purchase background check legislation without any holes. He believes America needs to strengthen its approach on mental illness towards buying a gun, and to see if Republicans and Democrats can find a comfort level. He explains that a criminal, mentally insane, or terrorist will not like this bill.

The bill trying to be passed is good for a law-abiding gun owner because it has expanded the ability to use the 2nd amendment. Parker, Kathleen. “Kathleen Parker: An impotent gun-control solution. ” The Washington Post: National, World ; D. C. Area News and Headlines – The Washington Post. The Washington Post, 9 Par. 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. Kathleen Parker explains the only argument Obama Administration’s push for tighter gun control would be Newton. She then goes on saying there is nothing proposed in gun-control debates that would have prevented the mass killing of children.

To make people feel better, tighter gun laws. She brings up the fact that universal background checks are a good idea, but they will not stop a burglar who can illegally purchase rifles and shotguns. Even with a background check, Newton would not have been prevented. She also unravels banning assault weapons and large magazines are appealing, but what defines an assault weapon? Criminals will always have guns. Barrett, Paul M.. “Good News on Gun Violence Could Shape Gun Control Debate. Businesslike – Business News, Stock market & Financial Advice. Bloomberg L. P. , 7 May 2013. Web. 5 July 2013.

Gun Violence in America is way down says the Federal Government. Firearm homicides have declined 39 percent since 1993 according Bureau of Justice Statistics report released on May 7, 2013. A separate study by the Pew Research Center put the 69 percent. Even though there is positive data, those who would reform the nation’s gun laws might create a problem. The main arguments of gun control by tighter restrictions on firearms are to cut crimes even more. The President proposed a ban n the sale of assault weapons like semiautomatic military-style rifles that need larger ammunition magazines.

Horton, Jason. “The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Don’t Want to See. ” Breaking news and opinion on Debatable. The Blaze Inc, 6 May 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. In this article, statistics show that states with strict gun control have higher murder and crime rates. Taking examples and numbers from the FBI data in 2011, it shows California and New Jersey with the highest number of murders and Just so happened these states have strict gun control. Holt, Myths. “Do Strict Gun Laws Really Stop Gun Crime?. ” Breaking news and opinion on Debatable. The Blaze Inc, 22 Par. 2013. Be. 5 July 2013. In this article, it throws out states that believe in tougher gun laws have fewer gun related crimes, thus partially obviating the need for self defense. The more tighter the gun laws are, the argument goes; the more likely one is to face someone with a firearm who has no business owning one. It moves right in on assault weapons bans are “a fraud” perpetrated “to fool the public into accepting a movement that had been rejected not simply in conservative states, but liberal as well. It also has some states rejecting the idea that gun control is effective at all.

W. , W.. “Gun violence and gun control: Dear life. ” The Economist – World News, Politics, Economics, Business & Finance. The Economist Newspaper Limited, 9 May 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. Because of the massive drop in gun violence since 1993, it has called into question the need for new, stricter regulations. As guns are seen as necessary tools of public safety and self-defense, gun control itself may seem increasingly dangerous. Now that humans have a longer life span, the fact someone’s life is being taken away is opposed more precious than it was before.

Through gradual evolution, and the refinement of rational capacities this has guided us away from ancient strategies of violence. Dixon, Ronald. “Refuting common arguments against gun control. ” Mandalay. Com – The Minnesota Daily. Minnesota Daily, 21 Jan. 2013. Web. 5 July 2013. Several conservatives have voiced their opposition to any sort of new measure to regulate guns. They have referred to Beam’s gun laws and actions as an “executive power grab. ” The current Texas Governor Rick Perry declared that prayer would be a better alternative than to new gun laws.

In this article Dixon explains Obama is in fact not trying to confiscate our guns, rather banning assault weapons that are privately owned, or the limitation of clips to ten rounds. The most common arguments against gun regulations are that guns should not be blamed for the actions of criminals. Guns don’t kill people; people kill people. Stolen, John . “Why Guns Are Good. ” Fox News – Breaking News Updates Latest News Headlines Photos & News Videos. Fox News Network, LLC, 23 June 2010. Web. 5 July 2013.

In this article, it talks about how we do not hear about the crimes stopped because loud be victims showed a gun and scared criminals away. Those stopped crimes confiscated, and when they do report them, the media tend to ignore them. This type of publicity produces a distorted public impression of guns and if you only hear about the crimes and accidents, and never about lives being saved, you might thing gun ownership is folly. Fetter, Jim. “Why gun control is bad for America. ” Veterans Today – Military Veterans and Foreign Affairs Journal – VA – Veterans Administration. Veterans Today, 6 Par. 2013. Web. 5 July 2013.

President Obama been aggressively promoting gun control, and a recent appearance in Denver, CO appears to have reasons to believe that Colorado is going to be a pilot project for a nation-wide effort to secure universal registration as a step toward confiscation. This article relates President Obama to Hitter’s use of firearms registration lists led to the confiscate of guns and to the execution of gun owners. This is a powerful lesson to reveal why the American people and Congress should reject the registration of firearms by law-abiding Americans. Birding, Timothy. “Articles: Gun Control: A Failed American Experiment. American Thinker. American Thinker, 26 Jan. 2013. Be. 5 July 2013. It is no coincidence that the places with the strictest gun laws today are often the places with the highest crime rates in America and with high African-American populations; the vestiges of slavery leads “the Man” to try to disarm the African- American population, and the law is ignored by the criminal element Just as the law was ignored by criminals in the 18th and 19th centuries. Formal Outline Thesis: Implementing gun control policies throughout the U. S. Will not make guns disappear, furthermore it will Just mask all citizens good or bad have automatic l.

Issues on Gun Control paeans. A. History of gun control in the United States b. Congressmen views on Gun Control c. What the population feels about it d. Controversies that contradict any legislation e. What can be agreed on in this argument II. Opposing Views f. The main argument g. Tougher gun laws equals less crime h. Gun control would have prevented massacre killings Ill. Supporting Views I. In violation of the 2nd amendment J. Thomas Jefferson quote k. Government having too much power l. Not about guns, it’s about Control IV. My Views m. Military Life n. Questionnaire for chain of command o. Gun Range p. Defenseless