Government should not restrict the citizens with stronger gun control laws. Crime and guns the two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And If so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, Is nothing new.
In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Pollute said, “our choice is not merely to purport or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions. ” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws. There are two major sides or parties in the political realm that are lobbying either for or against gun control. These two would of course be the Democrats and the Republicans, the two dominating parties in the country today.
The Republicans have long been supporters of the pro gun movement, largely due to both their conservative nature as well as an increased backing over the years y the National Rifle Association, a powerful force In the pro gun movement. During the 2000 elections the NEAR gave 92 percent of Its Congressional campaign contributions to the Republicans (Steel, 2010), Glenn the party ample ammo to promote their cause. Democrats are known to be largely for gun control but as public support has waned, in part due to an increase in gun sales after the 9/1 1 attacks so too has the Democrats enthusiasm to bring up the issue.
No doubt both sides seek to win votes by appealing to a specific side of the debate; in this case the Republicans re winning. Banning guns or prohibition will not make them disappear, or make them any less dangerous. In order to protect themselves, their family, and their property, it is a legitimate right of citizens to own weapons. Society will not become safer by restricting gun ownership as guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Also, in the majority of cases Involving guns or firearms, the weapon used is not legally bought or registered; It Is either smuggled or stolen from registered owners.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms started keeping records of the number of nuns produced In 1998, and publish a yearly report on the number of guns that are made for the domestic market and for export. However, it is voluntary to do so by the gun manufacturers, and up to 25% of makers don’t give such information to the TAFT. Combined with previous existing firearms, one can only estimate the number of functional firearms in America. Many people assume that since a gun is a deadly weapon, producing more of them will result in a greater number of the guns to fall into criminal’s hands.
This trend has been consistent for over 40 years, with the rime rate following the inflation rate. One such prominent, high publicity gun control lobbyist group Is the Brady Campaign. The group succeeded in getting a bill passed in 1993 that marginally affected the national crime rate. The national and state crime data from 1960 show when a major gun control bill passed up until 1991 crime rates Increased. After the passage of The Firearms Owner’s Protection Act In 1986, the crime rate began to decrease. Crime averaged a 5. 5% gain from 1960-1985, while lowering . 05% after 1 986 when the law FOP was passed.
Localities have also Police crime data from the last 15 years (Byers,2009). It seems that many people forget that criminals break the law by practicing their profession. During a massacre in Columbine, CO in 1994, two students murdered 12 people and wounded 24 others before committing suicide. During this act, they broke laws against trespassing, arson, unsafe transportation of a firearm, ownership of a handgun by a minor, illegal straw purchases, possession of a banned weapon, carrying weapons onto school grounds, aggravated assault, attempted murder, and murder at a minimum.
Instead of protecting citizens, gun control does the opposite, strapping law abiding citizens from the ability to have a means of effective personal defense. The government should have stricter gun control laws for citizens. As a result of the many school shootings that have taken place in the last few years, there has been a huge push for stricter gun control laws. Many people don’t feel safe in today’s society. The government has been listening to the people and has already passed some laws. There are some people who are opposed to stricter gun control laws.
Many gun enthusiasts don’t believe that gun control laws really work because only the law abiding citizens would follow them and they arena the ones creating the problem. These people do present some good arguments for getting rid of gun control. Their arguments are not good enough to prevent stricter gun control laws. The government hasn’t gone so far as to ban guns completely yet, but they have started to pass some laws aimed at controlling guns. One thing that they have done is to require a waiting period and a background check before people can buy a handgun.
Gun dealers use a computerized instant check system to perform background checks. Many people argue that this system doesn’t really work. According to Newsweek, the system does block some people from getting guns, but it isn’t 100% effective. The system is only as good as the information entered into it, and many local courts are lax about reporting convictions (Newsweek, 30). Even if a potential criminal is stopped from buying a gun, they could still get one if they wanted to. According to John R. Lott Jar. , from the Chicago School of Law, these regulations only apply to gun dealers.
The matter of finding a solution to gun violence is complicated by the fact that many gun activists believe gun control measures do not provide any proven benefit to the public. However, stricter gun control laws have shown an improved general safety outside the U. S. Australia has succeeded in implementing effective gun control laws, leading to a decrease in both gun suicides and homicides. The Australian federal government persuaded all states and territories to enforce stricter bans on long guns that could be used in mass shootings.
While there were 13 mass shootings n Australia between 1979 and 1996, there have not been any since then, demonstrating how such measures have helped make Australia a safer place to live. The bottom line is that while guns should not be outlawed entirely, there should be stricter laws enforcing gun control policies. In our country, since Just about anyone can legally own a gun, it is much easier for tragedies to occur. While outlawing the use of guns is unconstitutional and unrealistic, enforcing proper gun control laws would create a much safer environment for everyone.