Gun Control

Gun Control Persecution of lawful gun owners Is the new call rights battle, many Americans claim As civilization has progressed, the weapons that coincide with this event have changed and increased In power as well as effectiveness. These guns do not occur only in war, as they have been used as a tool to hunt for food, and a means of protection for many households. There are many sides to this controversial topic as to how and if these weapons should or can be controlled.

In these divisive political times, gun safety and gun rights are too often pitted against each other. This paper will examine the following: 1. What did our founding fathers say about firearms? 2. The shootings that led some Americans to believe that gun control Is a good thing. 3. What happens when the government takes weapons? 4. Do more guns equal less crime? What Did Our Founding Fathers Say About Firearms? In 1791, The Bill of Rights of the U. S. Constitution was ratified.

The Second Amendment states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ” (Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, 1791) Our Founding Fathers coped tit serious questions and bestowed to us a powerful responsibility: to guard the rights conferred on Americans and to live responsibly alongside one another. The purpose of the Second Amendment is to arm Americans in order to prevent a tyrannical government.

An armed populace under the 2nd Amendment is completely consistent with the language of the founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence – “That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, It Is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish It, and to Institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.

Prudence will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, It Is their right. It Is their duty, to throw off such overspent and to provide new guards for their future security. ” (Thomas Jefferson.

Declaration of Independence, 1776. ME 1:29, Papers 1 5) At the center of today’s contentious debate on gun control is the U. S. Second Amendment and its role, Interpretation and place In modern-day society. There are those who would say, “The Second Amendment’s not needed anymore. There’s no threat of tyranny in our government. ” While it’s fortunate that we’ve grown comfortable with our government, we need to remain aware that the only reason we have been able to grow comfortable with It is because the Second Amendment has prevented the overspent from posing a threat to us for all these years.

History Is littered with stories of unarmed citizens being taken over by dictators. Could that happen here? 1 OFF Second Amendment stance, we seriously need to wonder about their motives. Each and every amendment in the Bill of Rights is important, but the the Second Amendment is the one of the most important because it guarantees that the others will not be taken away. Once the right to own firearms is eliminated, eliminating all other rights (such as the Freedom of Speech) will be a piece of cake. The Second Amendment is America’s insurance policy against this.

Shootings That Led Some Americans to Believe That Gun Control Is a Good Thing On April 20, 1999, teenagers Eric Harris and Dylan Keyhole killed a teacher and a dozen students at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. It was this tragedy that fueled a new campaign on gun control. According to Huffing Post, the shooting rampage at Columbine High School shocked the nation and briefly increased support for stricter gun laws which eventually eroded into more than a decade-long decline in support. Fernery, 2012) In the wake of the shooting, Congress held heated gun- intro debates. Then-Vice President AAA Gore cast a tie-breaking vote in the Senate to require background checks for firearms purchases at gun shows and to include safety devices, notably trigger locks, for new guns that are sold. The measure stalls in the House after a series of compromises left people on both sides of the issue disappointed. (Barron, 2012) The Virginia Tech massacre took place on April 16, 2007, on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blackburn, Virginia.

Swung-Huh Choc, a senior at Virginia Tech, shot and killed 32 people and mounded 17 others in two separate attacks, approximately two hours apart, before committing suicide. Although, it’s exceedingly easy to purchase handguns in the state of Virginia, what is ignored is that it’s illegal to bring such weapons on to the campus of Virginia Tech, and certainly illegal to use them for murder. Another law wouldn’t have disrupted the plans of a madman determined to kill. Eighteen months after the shooting, Virginia sees a 60 percent Jump in concealed handgun permit applications. Barron, 2012) On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lana was accused of fatally hooting twenty children and six adult staff members in a mass murder at Sandy Hook Elementary School in the village of Sandy Hook in Newton, Connecticut. The incident is the second deadliest mass shooting by a single person in American history, after the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre. The shootings prompted renewed debate about gun control in the United States, and a proposal for new legislation banning the sale and manufacture of certain types of semi-automatic firearms and magazines with more than ten rounds of ammunition.

What Happens When The Government Takes Its Citizens Weapons? Look at Chicago, which in 1982 passed a ban on all handguns except for those registered with the city before the ban was enacted. Since the handgun ban took effect, the number of murders in Chicago committed using handguns has been 40% higher than before the ban, and has spiked even higher in recent years, proving that the gun ban actually served to cause an increase in violent crime. (Watson, Bi’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program, 2013) In comparison, Britain has some of the strictest gun control laws in the developed world.

Despite the fact that it is virtually impossible for an average he I-J is higher per capita than the US and the highest in the world amongst “rich” countries aside from Australia, which also instituted a gun ban in the sass’s. (Bi’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program) Brutal dictatorships have almost always been preceded by widespread gun confiscation. The Nazi Weapons Law of November 1 1, 1938 prohibited Jews from “acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons,” (“Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny, 1993) and ordered them to turn in all guns and ammunition to local police.

As historian William Sheridan Allen (1965) noted, the Nazis also began house to house gun confiscations targeting “subversives” shortly after they came to power. Similarly, as J. E. Siskin and Aaron Zealand document in their book “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny (1993), in October 1918, the Council of People’s Commissars (the Communist government) ordered citizens to surrender all firearms, ammunition, and sabers, having first mandated registration of all weapons six months earlier. Just like the Nazis, Communist Party members were exempt from the ban.

Stalin disarmed is domestic enemies before launching a genocide against them. With Russians almost universally disarmed, Stalin was given free reign to carry out one of history most brutal prolonged genocide, with tens of millions of people executed or starved to death in the three decades that followed, a model subsequently mimicked in China and Cambodia. (Watson, 2013) Preventing law-abiding people from owning guns clearly has no impact on violent crime, and if anything causes it to rise because the criminals know their victims will not be able to defend themselves. Do More Guns Equal Less Crime?

In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting, the statistics illustrate that gun control does not reduce violent crime and in fact has the opposite effect. According to the latest figures obtained by the FBI, violent crime offenses in the United States have been falling since 2007. The five year trend shows that, despite there being an ongoing national debate about gun violence in America, violent crime itself is actually becoming less off problem. Over the last 40 years, the amount of guns in America per 1000 people has increased, where as serious violent crimes have creased.